77 Western Road, London (W5 5DT)

HM Land Registry title MX327985 · Freehold · £860,000 paid · W5 5DT

EALING, GREATER LONDON, GREATER LONDON

Who owns it

• Ecovia Investments Limited (09894205)

Proprietorship: Limited Company or Public Limited Company.

The building

• house
• Energy rating: D

From the Energy Performance Certificate register (Open Government Licence v3.0).

Sale history

• £860,000 · 2024-06-24 · Freehold

HM Land Registry Price Paid Data (Open Government Licence v3.0).

Planning at this postcode

• Roof extension to rear (main) roof slope; part rear roof extension to rear outrigger roof slope and installation of two rooflights to front roof slope
  Grant with Conditions, 2024-12-23 · London Borough of Ealing · 243389HH
• Roof extension to rear (main) roof slope incorporating a Juliet balcony; part rear roof extension to rear outrigger roofslope and installation of two roof lights to front roof slope
  Grant with Conditions, 2024-09-09 · London Borough of Ealing · 242794HH
• Rear roof extension to main roofslope incorporating a Juliet balcony; roof extension to rear outrigger roofslope including roof terrace with obscured glazed balustrade; and installation of two rooflights to front roofslope
  Refused, 2023-05-30 · London Borough of Ealing · 230929HH
• Roof extension to rear (main) roof slope; part rear roof extension to rear outrigger roof slope and installation of two roof lights to front roof slope.
  Grant with Conditions, 2021-06-28 · London Borough of Ealing · 213014FUL
• Notice under s.211 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 of intent to Fell and treat x1 Purple-leafed Plum tree (T2) at 85 Western Road, Greater London, London, W5 5DT We write in reference to our site survey of 5th May 2020 and confirm that we are the arboriculturists appointed on behalf of property insurers of the above risk address. It is the view of chartered engineers appointed to investigate damage that the property has suffered differential movement and subsequent damage consistent with tree related clay shrinkage subsidence. Further to discussions with the Structural Engineer who is assessing the required remedial works for the property, we are of the opinion that it is preferable to remove the implicated trees. This is because retaining the trees and implementing an engineered solution cannot happen without having serious effect on their root systems which are influencing the structure of the risk address. This submission consists of a formal notification under Conservation Area Regulations of our intention to remove the trees as mentioned above which we believe are not protected under any Tree Preservation Order. Whilst insurers have no requirement to submit prescribed levels of supporting evidence in relation to a Conservation Area notification we are enclosing copies of relevant technical reports, in the attached Appendices, as itemised below: 1. A site plan, survey tables and photographs which locates vegetation that is the subject of this notification. 2. Engineer's Appraisal Report 3. Engineer's Conclusion Report 4. Site investigation report dated January 2020 We have demonstrated, from the evidence detailed above, two tests in line with current case law that show: 1. Damage to the insured's property has resulted from tree related subsidence: . History and timing of damage indicates it is tree root induced movement . Pattern of damage relative to the trees and mechanism of movement implicates the itemised tree specie
  No Objection, 2020-07-02 · London Borough of Ealing · 202285PTC
• Notice under s.211 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 of intent to Fell and treat x1 Bay Laurel (S1) at 83-83a Western Road, Greater London, London, W5 5DT We write in reference to our site survey of 5th May 2020 and confirm that we are the arboriculturists appointed on behalf of property insurers of the above risk address. It is the view of chartered engineers appointed to investigate damage that the property has suffered differential movement and subsequent damage consistent with tree related clay shrinkage subsidence. Further to discussions with the Structural Engineer who is assessing the required remedial works for the property, we are of the opinion that it is preferable to remove the implicated trees. This is because retaining the trees and implementing an engineered solution cannot happen without having serious effect on their root systems which are influencing the structure of the risk address. This submission consists of a formal notification under Conservation Area Regulations of our intention to remove the trees as mentioned above which we believe are not protected under any Tree Preservation Order. Whilst insurers have no requirement to submit prescribed levels of supporting evidence in relation to a Conservation Area notification we are enclosing copies of relevant technical reports, in the attached Appendices, as itemised below: 1. A site plan, survey tables and photographs which locates vegetation that is the subject of this notification. 2. Engineer's Appraisal Report 3. Engineer's Conclusion Report 4. Site investigation report dated January 2020 We have demonstrated, from the evidence detailed above, two tests in line with current case law that show: 1. Damage to the insured's property has resulted from tree related subsidence: . History and timing of damage indicates it is tree root induced movement . Pattern of damage relative to the trees and mechanism of movement implicates the itemised tree species Ple
  No Objection, 2020-07-02 · London Borough of Ealing · 202281PTC

Local planning authority records. Applications at the postcode, which may cover neighbouring addresses.

This is the corporate ownership of the title as HM Land Registry records it. The full register entry, including any charges, is at HM Land Registry.

Information produced by HM Land Registry © Crown copyright and database right. A matter of public record about the property's corporate owner, not about any person.